|
TIE, The International Experimental Cinema
Exposition - a Retrospective
The 2007 Mary Riepma Ross Media Arts Center Edition
Sunday, September 16th (Program One: 1:30PM; Program Two: 4:00PM)
With Christopher May, TIE Director & Curator, In Person
Since
2000, the internationally-based TIE festival has been a leading
champion of artists still working in the medium of film, with a
particular focus on both new and historical avant-garde cinema.
TIE returns to UNL with two new programs specifically selected for
The Ross by TIE founder/director Christopher May. The exhibition
features an eclectic range of experimental films that illuminate
the continuing vitality and beauty of celluloid, while subtle and
at times obvious philosophical and thematic curatorial gestures
conduct the flow of the programs.
TIE
wishes to give special thanks to the Director of the Ross Media
Arts Center, Danny Lee Ladley, for making this event possible.
Mary
Riepma Ross Media Arts Center
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
313 N. 13th Street
Phone number: (402) 472-5353
_______________________________________________
Program
One: 1:30PM

Pan of the Landscape
(Christopher Becks, 11 min., Canada, 16mm,
2005)
Pan of the Landscape reflects Brakhage's influence …
but soon differences begin to appear … the use of painting
on film as means of achieving a lyrical, visionary freedom of light
and color is deeply undercut, as the solid stuff of the world begins
to resemble a bit of a prison.

Vom Innen; von aussen
(Albert Sackl, 20 min., Austria, 16mm, 2006)
"Von
Innen, von Aussen is a wonderfully unnerving, scrutinized,
study of the human body within the context of its environment. The
film opens with an empty apartment set in motion, revolving around
a fixed point. This introduces the kinetic fixation that Sackl explores
thoroughly within the film, the revolution. Implications of the
revolution within man's own self image and man's historic worldview
seem to be the larger conceptual concerns of the work. The revolution
is then applied to man, himself, where Sackl plays out in a score
of variations on the theme. At first, we see an unidentified nude
male subject revolving clockwise on his central axis in front of
a black background. It is evident that the backdrop is part of the
apartment, but it clear that Sackl intends it to be an empirical
environment for one portion of his study. Sackl then sets the revolving
man in motion back and forth across the face of the backdrop. Sackl
continues his formal investigation sending the revolving man back
and forth in space.
The
next major development is that the image splits and we view the
man in stereo. The two men's revolutions are synchronized at first,
then each takes on his own timing and direction. At this point the
viewer could easily define the film as simply a visual analysis
of the male figure in highly ordered motion, but then Sackl presents
the environment as variable. Suddenly, the black background is lifted
and anonymous natural background is presented. The landscape is
initially vacant, but the spinning man soon enters stage right and
makes his way back and forth, revolving all the while. The film
soon cuts back to the black background where more variations are
played out, the most noteworthy being the superimposition of the
man's front and back. The visual biomorphism is totally bizarre.
Throughout the remainder of the film, the environment continues
to shift between the apartment, natural landscapes and the black
backdrop. In the end, the empiricism of the blackened space is beautifully
tainted by rays of sunlight that are projected onto the scene from
a window behind the camera.
Ultimately,
the film has a truly meditative quality, a meditation that encompasses
our notions about our bodies and the rules that govern it, both
environmental and self-imposed. The precision of the filmmaking
is overwhelming, in a way that is echoed in the movements of the
male model. Something within the tight order applied to the man's
body brings to mind the iconic work of Leonardo de Vinci, which
imposes perfect geometries atop the human form."
-Noah Manos, TIE

Peng
Peng
(Dietmar Brehm, 7 min., Austria, 16mm, 2006)
"Shots of eyes gazing at each other are cut with a male and
female having sex, a black sky with white lightning, and an oddly
canted chair while a phone buzzes and rings in the background. There
is an intense, erotic tension between the two males gazing expressionlessly
at one another as the mustached one chews and twists a toothpick
in his mouth. It is so bizarre yet so intriguing that one can’t
help but be affected by the unsettling experience.."
- Nick Army, TIE
"Signal
tones and images woven into a rebus-like montage crime story: That’s
how one could outline the blueprint of Peng Peng, which
combines well-known material from Brehm’s archive and embeds
it in a framework narrative."
- Christian Höller

The
General Returns from One Place to Another
(Michael Robinson, 11 min., U.S., 16mm, 2006)
"Learning to love again, with fear at its side, the film draws
balance between the romantic and the horrid, shaping a simultaneously
skeptical and indulgent experience of the beautiful. A Frank O'Hara
monologue (from a play of the same title) attempts to undercut the
sincerity of the landscape, but there are stronger forces at play."

Living
(Frans Zwartjes, 15 min., Netherlands, 16mm newly restored
print, 1971)
Zwartjes' masterwork
and his most favorite film. "Living has an uneasy,
indefinable atmosphere. This strange swaying of the camera and the
music that keeps going on and on…" Living demonstrates
the cinematographic mastery of Zwartjes. He is the main character
of the film and handles the camera himself, pointing it towards
himself with his hand held out. Zwartjes: "I was as strong
as a bear in these times." The film is part of the series 'Home
sweet home', in which Zwartjes explores the house in The Hague he
had just moved into at the time. His wife and muse Trix plays the
other role. The two characters move restlessly through the house.
The film was made using an extreme wide angle lens (a 5.7), which
gives the image a strong sense of estrangement.

Fourth Watch
(Janie
Geiser, 9 min., U.S., 16mm, 2000)
The ancient Greeks divided the night into four sections; the last
section before morning was called the fourth watch. In these hours
before dawn, an endless succession of rooms is inhabited by silent
film figures occupying flickering space in a midcentury house made
of printed tin. Their presence is at once inevitable and uncanny.
A boy turns his head in dread, a woman’s eyes look askance,
a sleepwalker reaches into a cabinet which dissolves with her touch,
and hands write letters behind disappearing windows. The rooms reveal
themselves and fill with impossible, shadowed light. It is not clear
who is watching and who is trespassing in this nocturnal drama of
lost souls.

Outer
Space
(Peter Tscherkassky, 10 min., Austria,
35mm, 1999)
Foreign bodies penetrate the images and cause the montage to become
panic stricken. The outer edges of the film image, the empty perforations
and the skeletons of the optical track rehearse an invasion; they
puncture the anyway indeterminate action of the film . . . a shocker
of cinematographic dysfunctions; a hell-raiser of avant-garde cinema.
_______________________________________________
Program
Two: 4:00PM

Fuses
(Carolee Schneemann, 25 min., U.S., 16mm newly-restored print,
1965)
A silent film of collaged and painted sequences of lovemaking between
Schneemann and her then partner, composer James Tenney; observed
by the cat, Kitch.
"...I
wanted to see if the experience of what I saw would have any correspondence
to what I felt-- the intimacy of the lovemaking... And I wanted
to put into that materiality of film the energies of the body, so
that the film itself dissolves and recombines and is transparent
and dense-- as one feels during lovemaking... It is different from
any pornographic work that you've ever seen-- that's why people
are still looking at it! And there's no objectification or fetishization
of the woman."
–Carolee Schneemann
Fuses
was recently preserved by Anthology Film Archives with support from
the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts and the Film Studies
Center at the University of Chicago.
"The
film was preserved from the collage original, which is as much a
celluloid sculpture as it is a movie. The hand-spliced reel consists
of footage shot on multiple film stocks, is painted on both sides,
contains sections that are composed of splicing tape and is what
you might call funky. All the prints we’ve seen of Fuses
were made from later generation sources than the original. Thanks
to the content of the footage and the construction of the object,
Carolee was only ever able to make a reversal positive back in the
late 60s. She used this master to do some stretch printing and eventually
make an internegative, which resulted in a lot of built-in contrast,
darkness, and overall softness to the image. The new print, which
was made by Cineric Inc. in New York City, matches the vibrant color
of the original in a way that the old prints never could. It is
really something to behold."
-Andrew Lampert

Blow Job
(Andy Warhol, 35 min., U.S., 16mm newly restored print, 1963)
A sly commentary on voyeurism and audience expectations, Blow
Job is a quintessential masterpiece of avant-garde filmmaking.
When
Andy Warhol decided to shoot Blow Job, he rang Charles
Rydell and asked him to star in it, telling him that “all
he’d have to do was lie back and then about five different
boys would come in and keep on blowing him until he came,”
but that the film would only show his face. Charles agreed, but
when he didn't show up for the following Sunday afternoon shoot,
Andy reached him at Jerome Hill’s suite at the Algonquin and
screamed into the phone “Charles! Where are you?” Charles
responded: "What do you mean, where am I? You know where I
am - you called me,” and Andy the said “We’ve
got the camera ready and the five boys are all here, everything’s
set up!” Charles's shocked reply was: “Are you crazy?
I thought you were kidding. I’d never do that!”...They
ended up using a “good-looking kid who happened to be hanging
around the Factory that day” who, years later, Andy noticed
in a Clint Eastwood film. His identity remained unknown until a
fellow student from Edinboro State College, where Bookwalter majored
in art, identified him as the actor in Blow Job after seeing a screening
of the film in 1994 at The Warhol museum. In 2006, Callie Angell
confirmed the identity of Bookwalter in the first volume of the
Andy Warhol film catalogue raisonné.
Nice
Biscotts No. 2
(Luther Price, 7 min., U.S., 16mm, 2007)
Meat
Packing House
(Eduardo Darino, 17 min., Uruguay, 16mm, 1981)
While turning objectification and commodification on its head, this
propagandistic government film by Uruguayan filmmaker, Eduardo Darino,
presents an overview of the process on meat packing in Uruguay.
(Darino would eventually set up a small film studio, located in
the porn district of Manhattan.)
"The
film is absolutely hilarious with a real grindhouse feel (no pun
intended) coming from both the music and color palette. Meat
Packing House shows the incredibly clean, humane, and sexy
side of cattle slaughter. And at every turn we are reminded by real
life Uruguayans that they really do have "the best beef".
Known for "good beef and good football", this place looks
like a tourist's dream come true. People and cattle alike sunbathe
on the beach and then the beautiful men and women go out to extravagant
beef parties where meat platters flash in front of the camera..."
-Nick Army, TIE
_______________________________________________
To
schedule a TIE Retrospective for your organization, please
contact us at: 303-832-2387
|
|
|